research · vol 01 · bursa malaysia · 5-year study

Two out of three Malaysian stocks lost half their value

An analysis of 987 listed companies on Bursa Malaysia from April 2021 to April 2026 — what the headline index hides, and which sectors buried the money.

companies analysed
987
of 1,014 listed across Main, ACE, LEAP
median drawdown
−62%
peak to trough, typical stock
lost more than half
67.8%
670 of 987 companies
scroll ↓
i · the distribution

The shape of the pain

The KLCI tells you Bursa was flat to up over 5 years. The distribution of individual stocks tells a very different story — and the largest bucket is not the mild one.

0 – 25%
71
7.2% of universe
25 – 50%
236
23.9% of universe
50 – 75%
348
35.3% of universe
75 – 100%
332
33.6% of universe
the asymmetry

One in three Bursa stocks didn't just drop — they collapsed. Only 7% escaped with what you'd call a normal market drawdown.

ii · sector ranking

Where the money went to die

Eleven sectors with five or more listed companies, sorted from worst to best by median drawdown. The gap from top to bottom is 43 percentage points — meaning sector selection mattered far more than stock picking.

rank
sector
n
mean
median
>50%
01
Technology
121
−75.7%
−78.7%
90.1%
02
Healthcare
29
−70.1%
−75.0%
72.4%
03
Communication Services
23
−69.1%
−73.9%
73.9%
04
Basic Materials
100
−68.1%
−72.4%
78.0%
05
Industrials
266
−65.6%
−66.2%
74.4%
06
Consumer Cyclical
132
−61.9%
−61.7%
67.4%
07
Energy
27
−60.8%
−60.1%
81.5%
08
Real Estate
106
−50.4%
−50.6%
50.0%
09
Consumer Defensive
114
−50.2%
−50.0%
49.1%
10
Utilities
12
−46.9%
−47.9%
50.0%
11
Financial Services
39
−41.2%
−35.4%
28.2%

n = number of companies. Sectors with fewer than 5 listings excluded.

iii · the three worst

Sectors to avoid, in detail

The top of the leaderboard, with the five worst-performing stocks in each sector named.

№ 01 · technology

Technology

−78.7%
companies
121
>50%
90.1%
>75%
57.9%

Nine of every ten tech stocks lost more than half. Mostly semiconductors, electronics OSAT, and IT services shells.

five worst stocks
MMAG Holdings−99.2%
Pertama Digital−98.9%
Metronic Global−98.9%
SMTrack−98.3%
Mcom Holdings−98.3%
№ 02 · healthcare

Healthcare

−75.0%
companies
29
>50%
72.4%
>75%
48.3%

Don't blame healthcare. Four of the five worst names are rubber glove makers — the COVID bubble popping, not an industry in decline.

five worst stocks
LKL International−99.3%
Careplus Group−97.8%
BCM Alliance−97.1%
One Glove Group−96.0%
Supermax Corporation−95.1%
№ 03 · comms

Comms Services

−73.9%
companies
23
>50%
73.9%
>75%
47.8%

Two stories stacked — legacy telecom resellers killed by WhatsApp, plus pay-TV disruption. Astro lost 95%.

five worst stocks
mTouche Technology−97.7%
Asia Media Group−95.6%
Green Packet−94.8%
Astro Malaysia−94.8%
PUC−94.7%
the reframe

The headline "avoid healthcare" is wrong. Strip out the five glove makers and the sector sits mid-pack. The accurate warning is "avoid the post-COVID bubble names" — a single-industry story masquerading as a whole sector.

iv · sub-sector breakdown

The ten worst industries

A more granular look. Industries are GICS sub-sectors — a narrower cut than sectors. All ten worst sit inside three themes: rubber gloves, semiconductors and electronics, and IT services.

rank
industry
n
median
>75%
01
Medical Instruments & Supplies
10
−94.5%
90.0%
02
Communication Equipment
5
−92.8%
80.0%
03
Electronic Components
17
−85.1%
70.6%
04
Semiconductors
7
−82.9%
71.4%
05
Specialty Chemicals
23
−81.4%
60.9%
06
Tools & Accessories
8
−80.9%
62.5%
07
Information Technology Services
29
−80.3%
55.2%
08
Specialty Industrial Machinery
17
−80.0%
52.9%
09
Education & Training Services
5
−80.0%
60.0%
10
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
13
−79.0%
76.9%

n = number of companies. Industries with fewer than 5 listings excluded.

v · the ten biggest wipeouts

What RM 10,000 became

Real peaks, real troughs. All still trading — Bursa's half-sen minimum tick is the only reason these aren't at zero.

company
peak (rm)
trough (rm)
drawdown
Hong Seng Consolidated
1.920
0.005
−99.7%
Hextar Technologies Solutions
1.830
0.005
−99.7%
Meridian
1.400
0.010
−99.3%
Reneuco
2.100
0.015
−99.3%
LKL International
4.140
0.030
−99.3%
MMAG Holdings
3.050
0.025
−99.2%
Techna-X
2.900
0.025
−99.1%
Focus Dynamics Group
0.500
0.005
−99.0%
Advance Information Marketing
1.458
0.015
−99.0%
Euro Holdings
4.380
0.045
−99.0%
vi · asymmetric insights

What you won't read anywhere else

Five conclusions drawn from running the numbers at this scale — observations that don't appear in Malaysian retail finance media because nobody else has done the work.

insight 01 · the sector gap

Sector selection beat stock picking by a 2-to-1 margin

The gap between the worst sector (Technology, −78.7%) and the best (Financial Services, −35.4%) was 43 percentage points. A random pick from financials would have had less than half the drawdown of a random pick from tech. Which sector you chose dominated which stock you chose — the opposite of how most retail investors think about the problem.

insight 02 · the energy paradox

Energy hurt everyone but destroyed no one

Energy had only −60% median drawdown but 81.5% of energy stocks crossed the 50% threshold — the second-highest hit rate after Tech. The pattern: broad-based but capped. Almost everyone got hurt, few got destroyed. Commodity cycles don't go to zero the way shell companies do.

insight 03 · what bursa's "tech" actually means

Malaysia's tech sector isn't really tech

It's the global semiconductor supply chain dressed up in technology labels — Inari, ViTrox, Greatech, Pentamaster, Frontken, MPI. When the chip cycle turned in 2022, the entire cluster fell together. Five of the ten worst industries sit inside this single supply chain. Malaysia is a cyclical hardware play wearing growth-tech clothing.

insight 04 · the klci illusion

The index and the stocks lived in different universes

The KLCI looks fine because it holds 30 names heavily weighted toward Financials and Utilities — exactly the two sectors that survived. The median Bursa stock outside the KLCI had a completely different five years. "The market" and "the stocks" diverged, and the index masked the carnage.

insight 05 · the floor that isn't zero

Bursa's worst case is a trading rule, not resilience

None of the 987 stocks reached zero, but ten sit at RM 0.005 — Bursa's minimum tick size. For practical purposes, these stocks are worthless. The −99.7% floor isn't a feature of Malaysian markets being resilient; it's just the lowest price the exchange allows. Take the rule away and they'd be at zero.

vii · methodology
Universe1,014 tickers from Bursa Malaysia's official List of Companies PDF, January 2025. Main, ACE, and LEAP Markets. Excludes ETFs, bonds, and sukuk.
Window6 April 2021 → 6 April 2026. Companies that listed mid-window are measured from their first trading day.
Data sourceYahoo Finance daily closes via the yfinance API. 97% of universe fetched successfully. 27 tickers (mostly LEAP) excluded from analysis.
Drawdown formulaMaximum drawdown = (trough − peak) ÷ peak, where trough is the lowest close after the peak. Bounded at −100% by construction.
Sector classificationGICS-style tags via Yahoo Finance. Spot-verified against iSaham's Bursa-native taxonomy — Technology bucket matches within 3%.
Not capturedClose prices only, unadjusted for dividends. Excludes companies delisted before January 2025 — a survivorship bias that understates true severity.